Suspension ModesA 4-wheel vehicle can be understood as a 4-freedom degrees system defined by the independent movement of each wheel.If we combine these movements conveniently we can come with the so called "suspension modes", this is combined movements such as:
The first approximation to these body/vehicle movements can be modeled with simple linear math analysis. If we consider every wheel position measured in respect to the vehicle body we have four values named x0, x1, x2 and x3. In each wheel we also have a tire load, this is, a force between the tire and the vehicle body that we can name f0, f1, f2 and f3. The next step is to define the relationship between such forces and position values to characterize the suspension system.
|
![]() |
| In a single wheel system we would
characterize the spring effect by relating the wheel position and the
wheel force. In other words, we could define the force related to the
position as
if = F(xi). In most cases this is a linear relationship
we call "spring rate" The next step is to depart from individual forces and movements and be able to define the forces and the wheel positions in an integrated relationship. This can be followed in depth in our paper SAE 2002-01-3105 (screen).pdf that describes this relationship as
This math is particularly useful to model interconnected suspension systems, as it can perfectly separate the spring rates of every suspension mode.
|
|
Simulation of an interconnected suspensionOnce the suspension has been characterized with its two matrices, one for spring rates and another for damping rates, it becomes an excellent tool to analyze the entire suspension system. To do the simulation job we used the software CARSIM. It provided the advantage of being able to integrate C++ modules that would perform separate calculations during the simulation process. In addition to the matrix algebra shown above we had to develop specific non-linear models for our suspension systems. The use of gas springs introduces non-linear behavior of the entire system, particularly noticeable on the most extreme situations like at the Elk-test or the Fish-Hook maneuver. Once the system is defined, though, the CarSim simulation has proven extremely useful when evaluating behavior tendencies related to changes in the suspension system. |
![]() |
Simulations |
|
Traction enhancements can be proven by simulating the vehicle on some demanding circumstances. |
||
|
|
The test defines a SUV type of car negotiating a very irregular ramp. The vehicle with the conventional suspension fails to climb, while the free-axle crossing vehicle reaches the plateau at the end of the ramp.
|
|
|
The graphs below show the much smoother tire loads on the right that correspond to the same vehicle where the CREUAT system has been installed. |
|
Conventional System |
Creuat System
|